Skala hamaamin; Aryan Raof Azeez
Abstract
Theoretical readings differed on the subject of hybrid political systems, in terms of considering it a transitional stage between authoritarianism and democracy, or considering it a ...
Read More
Theoretical readings differed on the subject of hybrid political systems, in terms of considering it a transitional stage between authoritarianism and democracy, or considering it a stage in which the democratic transformation effort ended in certain cases that failed to reach a good democratic environment or democratic consolidation. The study started from a basic assumption that the political system in the Kurdistan region is a hybrid regime, and it relied on legal and political mechanisms and tools (elections, parliament.), In order to maintain the dominant political system and not change it, which raised the levels of tyranny. Politician in the region. In this context, the study works to address the issue in (the Kurdistan region) by answering the following question: To what extent is the political system in the Kurdistan region considered a hybrid system? What is the manner in which the political system works and the exercise of power in it? The study concluded that the nature of the political system in the Kurdistan region is an authoritarian nature with the prevalence of traditional loyalties, especially tribal and family, in all aspects of political life dominated by the two dominated parties, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and the Kurdistan Democratic Party, as well as in the hierarchy of power. Governor.
