جۆری توێژینهوه : Original Article
نوسهران
1 English Department,College of Education, University of Diyala, Iraq
2 English Department, School of Basic Education, University of Sulaimani
3 English Department, College of Education & Language, University of Charmo
پوخته
The research in Politeness has received special momentum since the last few decades. Additionally, theorists and pragmaticians have approached it from different perspectives like the social-norm, conversation-maxim, conversation-contact, face-management, discursive (relational work), and others. In this paper, three approaches of politeness are revisited highlighting their characteristics and their drawbacks. These models are chosen to investigate due to their pioneering roles in the domain; they are namely Lakoff‟s (1973), Leech‟s (1983), and Brown & Levinson‟s (1987). The significance of this paper lies in its focus on the pioneering politeness theories - which are solidly grounded in Grice‟s Maxims - ,and their approaching fashions in researching politeness. It is worth mentioning that this study is extracted from the literature review of a PhD dissertation investigating the Kurdish EFL learners‟ interlanguage pragmatics.
وشه بنچینهییهكان
2 Blum-kulka, S., 1987. Indirectness and Politeness in Requests :Same or Different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), pp.131-46.
3 Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C, 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4 Cruse, A., 2000. Meaning in Learning: An Itroduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. oxford: oxford university press.
5 Crystal, D., 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
6 El-Samir, S.F., 2014. Politeness: A Socio- Pragmatic Study. Journal of the College of Languages, (28), pp.1-37.
7 Fasold, R., 1990. The Sociolinguistics of Language. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
8 Foley, W., 1997. Anthropological Linguistics: An introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
9 Grice, P., 1991. Studies in the Way of Words. 1st ed. USA: Harvard University Press.
10 Holmes, J., 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Longman.
11 Kasper, G., 1990. Linguistic Politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), pp.193-218.
12 Lakoff, R.T., 1973. The Logic of Politeness; or minding your p's and q's. Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago, pp.292-305.
13 Lakoff, R.T., 1975. Language and Women's Place. New York: Harper & Row.
14 Lakoff, R.T., 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language in our Lives. New Yourk: Basic Books.
15 Leech, G., 2007. Politenes: Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research, 3(2), pp.167-206.
16 Leech, G., 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. 1st ed. oxford: oxford university press.
17 LoCastro, V., 2012. Pragmatics for Language Teachers. New York: Taylor & Francis.
18 Locher, M.A., 2012. Politeness research from past to future, with a special focus on the discursive approach. In Amaya, L.F..L.M..M.R..C. New perspectives on (im)politeness and interpersonal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp.1-22.
19 Spencer-Oatey, H. & Žegarac V., 2010. Pragmatics. In N. Schmitt, ed. An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. 2nd ed. London: Hodder Education. pp.70-88.
20 Watts, R., 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21 Yule, G., 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
)